Selasa, 17 September 2013

HW02 Wildan Aulia Rachman



Task One
·         Water could be retained, raised, and distributed to summer crops with the aid of barrages constructed on the Nile below Cairo and at sites on 30.000 km of new canal
Reason: The result of the transformation of Nile River.

·         Cash crops such as cotton, sugar cane, and vegetables tended and still tend to be produced at the expense of subsistence crops.
Reason: the effect of the transformation that really benefit for agricultural.

·         As the amount of land available for agriculture increased, so did the population. Egypt’s population has increased from 2.5 million in the early 1800s to 9.7 million in the late 1800s, 18.8 million in the 1940s, 37 million in the mid-70s, and 46 million in 1984.
Reason: As the impact of Egyptians who preferred to live within or near the cultivated land area.

·         Recent studies have indicated that approximately 1-2% of Egypt’s arable land is lost annually to human encroachment.
Reason: The bad effect of transformation of Nile River, there are a lot of people that exploit the land irresponsible.


Task Two
            I think the second summary provides the right amount of details. We can see from the text, the details is clearly shown and every single reader can understand and achieve the information contain in the text.
            My own summary of the third paragraph.
            Egyptians have historically preferred to live within or near the cultivated land area and year by year the population of Egypt has increased. In the early 1800s the population was 2.5 million, 9.7 million in the late 1800s, 18.8 million in the 1940s, 37 million in the mid-70s, 46 million in 1984. The impact of that phenomenon is 1-2% of Egypt’s arable is lost annually because of human exploitation.







Task Three
            After read the text and the reason of the underlined sentences, I have a little different opinion. Such as, the writer prefers to ignore the specific details about the different principles. Because I think it is pretty important for the reader to be informed. And there are also a couple of reasons that contradictive with my opinion, when I think it is not to important to underlined but the writer underlined it.

Task Four
1.    I think the writer write the text by his own word, but the idea is still the same. Details and support for the text also exist in his summary, and also he didn’t add his own opinion, view and comment.
2.    The writer presents the main idea of the text and there are enough support and explanation in the text.
3.    The rewrite summary is fairly objective.
4.    And it is not too long, good enough to read for the reader.
5.    The writer has used his own word and he also didn’t paraphrase the specialized vocabulary or technical terms.
6.    There are some cases that are missing in the rewrite summary, for example are the two kinds of principles about patent.
7.    The writer changes some details, he didn’t write it down in the rewrite summary.
8.    The last is the writer didn’t paraphrase the specialized vocabulary or technical terms, for example World Intellectual Properties Organization (WIPO).






Name                          : Wildan Aulia Rachman
Class                          : 11 Dik B REG
No. Reg                      : 2215110879

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar